The means oriented versus goal-oriented dimension is, among the six dimensions, most closely connected with the effectiveness of the organization. In a means oriented culture the key feature is the way in which work has to be carried out; people identify with the “how”. In a goal oriented culture employees are primarily out to achieve specific internal goals or results, even if these involve substantial risks; people identify with the “what”.
In a very means oriented culture people perceive themselves as avoiding risks and making only a limited effort in their jobs, while each workday is pretty much the same. In a very goal oriented culture, the employees are primarily out to achieve specific internal goals or results, even if these involve substantial risks.
In a very internally
driven culture employees perceive their task towards the outside world as
totally given, based on the idea that business ethics and honesty matters most
and that they know best what is good for the customer and the world at large. In a very externally
driven culture the only emphasis is on meeting the customer’s requirements;
results are most important and a pragmatic rather than an ethical attitude
This dimension is distinguishable from means versus goal orientation because in this case it is not impersonal results that are at stake, but the satisfaction of the customer, client or commissioning party.
This dimension refers to the amount of internal structuring, control and discipline.
A very easy-going culture reveals loose internal structure, a lack of predictability, and little control and discipline; there is a lot of improvisation and surprises.
A very strict work discipline reveals the reverse. People are very cost conscious, punctual and serious.
In a local company employees identify with the boss and/or the unit in which one works. In a professional organization the identity of an employee is determined by his profession and/or the content of the job.
In a very local culture employees are very short term directed, they are internally focused and there is strong social control to be like everybody else. In a very professional culture it is the reverse.
This dimension relates to the accessibility of an organization. In a very open culture newcomers are made immediately welcome, one is open both to insiders and outsiders, and it is believed that almost anyone would fit in the organization. In a very closed organization it is the reverse.
This aspect of the culture is most related to the management philosophy per se.
In very employee oriented organizations members of staff feel that personal problems are taken into account and that the organization takes responsibility for the welfare of its employees, even if this is at the expense of the work.
In very work oriented organizations there is heavy pressure to perform the task even if this is at the expense of employees.
This dimension tells us to which degree the leadership style of respondents’ direct boss is being in line with respondents’ preferences. The fact that people, depending on the project they are working for, may have different bosses doesn’t play a role at the level of culture. Culture measures central tendencies.
This dimension shows to which degree respondents identify with the organization in its totality. People are able to simultaneously identify with different aspects of a company. Thus, it is possible that employees identify at the same time strongly with the internal goals of the company, with the client, with one’s own group and/or with one’s direct boss and with the whole organization. It is also possible that employees don’t feel strongly connected with any of these aspects.